The Respondent’s arguments to the contrary count on authorized authorities from the sphere of diplomatic protection, not bilateral expense treaties. [ ] demonstrated that Rosneft, since the successor in curiosity to YNG, experienced breached its obligation to repay certain bank loan agreements among YNG and the offshore Yukos entity. The Russian

Claimant, in its Reply, doesn't contest Respondent’s demonstration in Annex B for the Statement of Protection the setting up selling price, closing selling price along with other parameters in the YNG auction were in compliance with Russian law and in step with Worldwide practice, and which the steps of Yukos and its administration - in blocking